Greetings,
Well now that we are unofficially in the
"New Cold War," I think it's a good time to add a new entry.
On Tuesday night this week, I went to see
former Secretary of State and former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice
speak at Texas A&M. Let me start by saying that she is an extremely
charismatic, well-spoken, witty, and humorous public figure. She had a lot of
interesting perspectives, both good and bad in my opinion, which I'll get to in
a minute. If you're a conservative, this is the person you should be pushing as
the only viable candidate in 2016. Honestly, who is going to compete with
Hillary Clinton (assuming she runs)? Every other household name in the
Republican Party either has too much baggage, or is too far right. As for me, I'm
not in support of either of the main parties, which may not be the smartest way
to vote. But in my opinion, "tactical voting" has only propagated our
problems.
So I'll start with the positive things
that Condi had to say:
1) Ms. Rice is pro public education and
actually took a more Democratic stance on this issue. Now, I actually agree
with the ideology, which, oddly enough, is contrary to the overall Libertarian
platform. She asserted "American K-12 public schooling is in a dire
state." She also pointed out that if college becomes too expensive for
most people to afford, then America's role as a nation with equality of
opportunity would severely diminish. Like I said, I agree with Condi's
statements. However, she didn't propose any solutions.
I'm not quite sure that the federal
government is necessarily the solution to all of America's education problems.
But yes, they should play some sort of role in the reform process. I think
communities and municipalities are best suited to figure out what will work
best for them. Then, if they need help monetarily from the federal government,
they should apply for it and if deserved, be given that help. College is an
entirely different animal and I personally feel that all the subsidies do is
make college more expensive.
2) She also said; "Entitlements are
killing us." True, but again, she didn't propose any solutions.
I've already mentioned this in previous
posts, so here's a quick summation of my proposal. Implement the Fairtax (H.R.
25); everyone under the age of 28, unless they are already receiving Social
Security and Medicaid benefits, will now be responsible for their own
retirement (including medical health planning for post retirement years);
Welfare and Unemployment should be handled entirely at state and local levels;
and finally, disability should be the responsibility of the entity that caused
the person the disability. Now, with all that being said, there would obviously
be some exceptions to the rule, but those should be handled on a case-by-case
basis. Again, this is just a brief summation. I realize that it would be more
complicated and require detailed legislation to govern certain
circumstances.
3) Another good point; "We need to
continue to be a country of immigrants." I agree. All this
anti-immigration rhetoric coming from the right is pretty hypocritical when you
think of Adam Smith's view of the world and laissez faire economics. Free
crossing of international borders in all directions stimulates competition. Our
current protectionism is what makes prices high on American made products. A
truly free market (which would require more reform than just immigration)
allows for competition to give the consumer (of any good or service) the best
possible product for best possible price. I'm not saying just let anybody come
across our borders or through our air and seaports; but beyond screening out
criminals and fugitives, we should allow free flow of people. This doesn't mean
give them access to benefits, but let them come and earn their own way and let
the citizens here buy goods and services from them. If people here at home are
robbing us in the market because they don't have to compete with equally
skilled labor at lower prices, then that isn't a free market at all.
4) Lastly, Ms. Rice made a simple
statement that I still agree with and it's something that drives me in my
everyday living. She said; "The class you're born into doesn't have to
determine the class you are as an adult, and ultimately, the one in which you
die." So true. Even with our problems, this country still allows us to be
the masters of our own universe, though not without struggle and hard work, but
that's okay. As bad as gets here, we still should be thankful that we don't
live in places like North Korea, where there is literally no hope or chance to
move out of the class you're born into, unless the state allows or facilitates
that (i.e. Olympic athletes). So Ms. Condoleezza Rice, thank you for your
positive thoughts and wisdom.
Now, here's where she went off the rocker,
at least in my opinion.
1). She literally called Putin an
"oppressive dictator" and compared the Russian annexation of Crimea
to Saddam's invasion of Kuwait. Wow. Really? Whether or not you believe that
the Crimean people's vote to become part of Russia was legitimate or not, the
fact remains that there was a vote. Saddam actually invaded with a full force
whose intent was to take over the country. Furthermore, in both instances, the West
drew the maps in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. So we only have ourselves
to blame for the all the turmoil and upheaval now happening in those parts of
the world. So let's try not getting involved for a change and see how
"letting nature take its course" plays out. Frankly, I don't see any
conflicts overseas threatening our way of life. Beyond insuring international
trade and commerce remains open, we have no business taking sides in foreign
conflicts.
2) Condi, who by the way has never been to
war, said; "If I were in charge, I would put a brigade in the Baltic
States to show Russia we are serious." Come on! How is Russia threatening
America here and why is it important for us to stop them? Please answer those
questions first, and then maybe I would consider foreign intervention providing
some utility for America. Is another conflict what America really needs right
now? Is more American money worth stifling Putin's ambition? Are more American
lives worth exerting American influence abroad? I think not.
Please comment and list your thoughts and
response to this, whether good or bad. I want to hear if these issues are of
concern to my peers, friends, and family. And if so, what are your
thoughts?
Until next time...stay conscious my
friends.
Semper Fi,
Chris Bentley